|
|
| 15 |
Sep 3, 2003 |
Jonathan Fellows |
Re: getting closer.... |
| 16 |
Sep 3, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
Re: [PreSmiley] Re: getting closer.... |
| 17 |
Sep 3, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
update |
| 18 |
Sep 3, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
PROPOSAL: opinions wanted |
| 19 |
Sep 3, 2003 |
Larry Cupp |
Re: [PreSmiley] PROPOSAL: opinions wanted |
| 20 |
Sep 3, 2003 |
Christopher Colucci |
Re: [PreSmiley] PROPOSAL: opinions wanted |
| 21 |
Sep 3, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Re: PROPOSAL: opinions wanted |
| 22 |
Sep 3, 2003 |
Larry Cupp |
Re: [PreSmiley] Re: PROPOSAL: opinions wanted |
| 23 |
Sep 3, 2003 |
Jonathan Fellows |
Re: [PreSmiley] PROPOSAL: opinions wanted |
| 24 |
Sep 3, 2003 |
Thomas Austad |
Re: [PreSmiley] PROPOSAL: opinions wanted |
| 25 |
Sep 3, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Re: PROPOSAL: opinions wanted |
| 26 |
Sep 3, 2003 |
Billy Vanson |
Re: [PreSmiley] Re: PROPOSAL: opinions wanted |
| 27 |
Sep 3, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
Re: [PreSmiley] PROPOSAL: opinions wanted |
| 28 |
Sep 3, 2003 |
Michael Tomeo |
RE: [PreSmiley] PROPOSAL: opinions wanted |
| 29 |
Sep 4, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Re: PROPOSAL: opinions wanted |
| 30 |
Sep 4, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
big news |
| 31 |
Sep 4, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
Re: [PreSmiley] big news |
| 32 |
Sep 4, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
1967 draft |
| 33 |
Sep 4, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
and yet another clarification |
| 34 |
Sep 4, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Rookie List |
| 35 |
Sep 4, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
WAA ownership? and draft order ties |
| 36 |
Sep 4, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
Re: [PreSmiley] Rookie List |
| 37 |
Sep 4, 2003 |
Billy Vanson |
Re: [PreSmiley] Rookie List |
| 38 |
Sep 4, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Re: Rookie List |
| 39 |
Sep 4, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
Re: [PreSmiley] Rookie List |
| 40 |
Sep 4, 2003 |
Billy Vanson |
Re: [PreSmiley] Rookie List |
| 41 |
Sep 4, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
Re: [PreSmiley] WAA ownership? and draft order ties |
| 42 |
Sep 4, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
lottery reminder |
| 43 |
Sep 4, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Just so you know..... |
| 44 |
Sep 4, 2003 |
Jonathan Fellows |
Re: [PreSmiley] Rookie List |
| 45 |
Sep 4, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
team selection order |
| 46 |
Sep 4, 2003 |
Dennis Van Langen |
Re: team selection order |
| 47 |
Sep 4, 2003 |
Dave Jackson |
Re: team selection order |
| 48 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Dennis Van Langen |
Re: team selection order |
| 49 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
rookies page |
| 50 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Jonathan Fellows |
Re: rookies page |
| 51 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
Re: [PreSmiley] Re: rookies page |
| 52 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
need ballpark effects |
| 53 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
2 more teams have been taken |
| 54 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Larry Cupp |
Re: [PreSmiley] need ballpark effects |
| 55 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Re: need ballpark effects |
| 56 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
SuperHAL logic lines |
| 57 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
2 more teams picked.... Mike Rescigno is up |
| 58 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Re: 2 more teams picked.... Mike Rescigno is up |
| 59 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Thomas Austad |
Re: [PreSmiley] Re: 2 more teams picked.... Mike Rescigno is up |
| 60 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
Re: [PreSmiley] Re: 2 more teams picked.... Mike Rescigno is up |
| 61 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Re: Tom I'll trade |
| 62 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Re: 2 more teams picked.... Mike Rescigno is up |
| 63 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
WAA draft picker? |
| 64 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Larry Cupp |
Re: [PreSmiley] Re: need ballpark effects |
| 65 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Re: need ballpark effects |
| 66 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
PreSmiley@yahoogroups.com |
New poll for PreSmiley |
| 67 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
PreSmiley@yahoogroups.com |
New poll for PreSmiley |
| 68 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
if you already voted..... |
| 69 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
TRADING DEADLINE and AUTOPLAY |
| 70 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
vote YES for "FIELDING RATING TRANSFERABILITY" |
| 71 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
think of the your children!!!! |
| 72 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
Re: [PreSmiley] TRADING DEADLINE and AUTOPLAY |
| 73 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Where's RESCIGNO? |
| 74 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Larry Cupp |
Re: [PreSmiley] Where's RESCIGNO? |
| 75 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Re: Where's RESCIGNO? |
| 76 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Larry Cupp |
Re: [PreSmiley] Re: Where's RESCIGNO? |
| 77 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Gary Dewing |
Re: [PreSmiley] if you already voted..... |
| 78 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
Re: [PreSmiley] if you already voted..... |
| 79 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Gary Dewing |
Re: [PreSmiley] if you already voted..... |
| 80 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Larry Cupp |
Choices |
| 81 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Re: think of your children!!!! |
| 82 |
Sep 5, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Re: think of your children!!!! |
| 83 |
Sep 6, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
All 16 teams will be owned! |
| 84 |
Sep 6, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Re: All 16 teams will be owned! |
| 85 |
Sep 6, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
votes and 1966+ draft order |
| 86 |
Sep 6, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
To those who haven't voted |
| 87 |
Sep 6, 2003 |
Thomas Austad |
The future (history?) of Pre-Smiley |
| 88 |
Sep 6, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
Re: [PreSmiley] The future (history?) of Pre-Smiley |
| 89 |
Sep 6, 2003 |
Thomas Austad |
Re: The future (history?) of Pre-Smiley |
| 90 |
Sep 6, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
Re: Re: The future (history?) of Pre-Smiley |
| 91 |
Sep 6, 2003 |
Steve Bivens |
RE: [PreSmiley] votes and 1966+ draft order |
| 92 |
Sep 6, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
Re: [PreSmiley] votes and 1966+ draft order |
| 93 |
Sep 6, 2003 |
Steve Bivens |
RE: [PreSmiley] votes and 1966+ draft order |
| 94 |
Sep 6, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
Re: [PreSmiley] votes and 1966+ draft order |
| 95 |
Sep 6, 2003 |
Thomas Austad |
Re: The future (history?) of Pre-Smiley |
| 96 |
Sep 6, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Rescigno takes PHN |
| 97 |
Sep 6, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
PHN selects Lee Bales, the switch-hitter from Los Angeles, CA |
| 98 |
Sep 6, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
but seriously folks.... |
| 99 |
Sep 6, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
Re: [PreSmiley] but seriously folks.... |
| 100 |
Sep 6, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Re: but seriously folks.... |
| 101 |
Sep 6, 2003 |
Steve Bivens |
Poll |
| 102 |
Sep 7, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Deeper Draft? Fact or Fiction? |
| 103 |
Sep 7, 2003 |
Barry Davis |
Re: [PreSmiley] Deeper Draft? Fact or Fiction? |
| 104 |
Sep 7, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Draft Order Ideas |
| 105 |
Sep 7, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Re: Deeper Draft? Fact or Fiction? |
| 106 |
Sep 7, 2003 |
Barry Davis |
Re: [PreSmiley] Re: Deeper Draft? Fact or Fiction? |
| 107 |
Sep 7, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
BTW |
| 108 |
Sep 7, 2003 |
Alan Boodman |
the team draft continues (eventually) |
| 109 |
Sep 7, 2003 |
Gary Dewing |
Re: [PreSmiley] Re: Where's RESCIGNO? |
| 110 |
Sep 7, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Serpentine Dratt? |
| 111 |
Sep 7, 2003 |
Steve Bivens |
RE: [PreSmiley] Serpentine Dratt? |
| 112 |
Sep 7, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Re: Serpentine Dratt? |
| 113 |
Sep 7, 2003 |
Steve Bivens |
RE: [PreSmiley] Re: Serpentine Dratt? |
| 114 |
Sep 7, 2003 |
Steve Dewing |
Re: Serpentine Dratt? |
| 115 |
Sep 7, 2003 |
Steve Bivens |
RE: [PreSmiley] Re: Serpentine Dratt? |
|
|
Previous message
Next message
Message #: 15
Message from: Jonathan Fellows
Sent: Sep 3, 2003
Subject: Re: getting closer....
Alan:
I think Mike's suggestion is a better way of going about it. I was
imagining a convoluted lottery that would end up with nobody getting
their first choice, which would be followed by attempts to swap
teams. Having the free agent draft in reverse order of the team
draft would be the way to go.
--- In PreSmiley@yahoogroups.com, "Alan Boodman" <alan.boodman@v...>
wrote:
> Billy Vanson has signed on as owner #12, and Mike Tomeo has agreed
to take the one non-folding team that nobody seems to want (the A's)
on a temporary basis, hopefully at least through the 1967 draft.
That means we only have 2 more slots to fill before we can assign
teams.
>
> Mike has also suggested that perhaps a better (and certainly a
SIMPLER) way to assign teams is to have a lottery of owners, and
owners pick teams in the random order which comes out of the
lottery. The 1967 draft would then be held in the reverse order of
the lottery. If we use that approach, the Mets (we'll think of them
as the #16 pick among teams, and therefore #1 in the 1967 draft) and
exempted, and we'll throw the Senators in at #15 (and the #2 slot in
the 1967 draft).
>
> This approach is more effective because of its simplicity and
because it forces us to realize that *somebody* is going to end up
with the moderately unpopular teams (which appear to be ones like the
two Chicago teams, the Reds, and a few others). Another way of
looking at it is that even if everyone expands their lists to 9 teams
or so, that still doesn't guarantee everyone a team they really want;
there are no guarantees when there's this much overlap among lists
and so few really popular teams.
>
> We all benefit from the fact that the A's and Mets (and Senators)
are off the board, so none of the rest of us will be "stuck" with one
of the truly bad teams.
>
> Alan |
